Wolf Hunt Debate

Against wolf Hunt http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/14/wolf-hunts-idaho-montana_n_926465.html

The wolf hunt is strongly debated by two very different sides. Many environmental groups feel it’s wrong to hunt wolves because it would kill off way more wolves than necessary and put them back at risk. They tried a petition to put wolves back on the endangered species list but it had failed. They feel skeptical because they think wolves have only barley recovered and are still at risk for going back into being endangered. They also argue that there has not been a wolf attack on a human since the 1990's. They think that wolves still need protection and this wolf hunt will be very hard the future of wolves and open the doors for many things that will harm them. Many people against it think it is unconstitutional to take them off the endangered list and separated powers.  They think wolves should still have protection and that people are exaggerating the problems of wolves so they can have something else to hunt.

For Wolf Hunt http://www.subletteexaminer.com/v2_news_articles.php?heading=0&page=72&story_id=1831

On the other hand people are complaining their livestock is being eaten by wolves and the big game like deer and elk herds getting much smaller. Hunters are the majority of the group and farmers. They claim that wolves are taking out their livestock and causing them lots of money, they feel the wolves are overpopulated and many would like to get rid of them all together. Hunters also feel that wolves have made a huge comeback, now there is so many of them that they are taking out the big game making it harder for them to hunt and get food during hunting season. Many people believe it should be up to the state to handle wolf management because they are the ones dealing with it. They think wolves have caused nothing but problems and want the number of wolves to decline heavily.